First Healthcare, Now Banks: Is Anyone Seeing A Pattern Here? by
Dr. Elaina George
Health care reform is the latest piece of the puzzle to be put in place. If you add this to what has happened in the financial industry and the banking industry (and don't forget Government Motors - GAvg.) a bigger picture begins to emerge. With the proposed financial regulations, there seems to be a movement towards the consolidation of power in a few institutions, systematically removing free competition, setting up the too big to fail phenomenon, thereby giving people less choice that will ultimately cost everybody more in the long run.
It is not hard to visualize a future where there will only be a certain number of hospitals that are able to provide care for specialized diseases such as cardiac care, or orthopedic surgery. If that happens, access will be restricted since patients will be limited as to where they will be able to go to receive their care. If there was only one specialty heart center in the city and only a certain number of doctors on staff, by definition, there will be a limited number of patients that can be treated at any specific time. Unfortunately, these changes will likely lead to the de facto rationing of care. In addition to the problem of access, costs will likely go up because of the lack of competition.
The demise of Lehman Brothers and the consolidation of other large financial companies have led to very few winners in the financial industry – the biggest of which is Goldman Sachs. The banking industry has seen a few surviving large institutions such as Chase and Citibank. What the larger banks didn’t acquire in mergers, the FDIC removed by taking over and closing hundreds of smaller and community banks. Makes you wonder if the credit unions will be next on the list.
I see this as being Marxism in Socialist Clothing. Socialism can be sold easily to a legion of College-Indoctrinated Americans who truly have been taught to believe that Socialism is a "Government That Cares" while it controls. Driving Socialism forward at a breakneck pace in key institutions and areas causes instability, which appears to be the goal. Once the apple cart tips due to any number of factors (A financial collapse in another country that we are heavily invested in, a suitcase nuke in the Potomac basin, a group of car bombs that detonates in NYC or San Diego or maybe 20 or 30 major cities at once, or fill in the blank with a destabilizing event or series of events here) then the "Government That Cares" will impose Martial Law and suspend Habeas Corpus (for our own protection, of course) and make the short hop from Socialist State to Marxist Dictatorship. With government control of the health institutions and financial institutions, every other service can be easily controlled, including the production and distribution of food.
If they who occupy the US Government were only directed toward the goal of establishment of Socialism there would be no need for the rapid movement and crippling policies; simply changing the rules and appointing enough judges at all levels to thwart future lawmakers in any attempt to stop Progressive Socialism would be enough to ensure the establishment of Socialism. No, this is using Socialist policies to cripple the major internal institutions of the USA, leading to collapse in those institutions, with the goal of filling the void with a Marxist government, perpetuated by judicial fiat even if the facade of periodic elections continues. Two years ago this would be something unthinkable; now I welcome anyone to refute it as being a strong possibility. Frankly, if I'm wrong about it I'll be happy to be so.